- Alina's blog -
Has been a long time since I started working (with others) on building a new model of (Mozilla) community here in Barcelona and around (and I know I have to write more about this experience).
“What is the future of learning, freedom and the web? It’s a slate of ongoing projects. It’s a percolating of new ideas. It’s a crossbreeding of old categories. It’s a building of new relationships. It’s a founding of new organizations. It’s the construction of new systems. It’s the coining of new words. It’s the creation of a new reality. Together. [..] What really keeps a community going? Shared work, shared goals, shared fun, shared vocabulary, and shared rituals. There doesn’t have to be one ultimate unified vision. The idea of what learning will mostly look like in ten years, 50 years, or 100 years remains fuzzy, and that’s by design, because one definition of an improved future is one that has a greater diversity of choices than in the past. [..] In many ways, the medium speaks louder than the message” – From the book Learning, Freedom and the Web.
When I refer to a new model of community, I mean designing new processes, creating new event frameworks that can invite others to participate and adopting new practices for community development. That can mean interacting with people you’ve never did before, start conversations with other communities of practice, delegate responsibility and act as a coach for the new, future community leaders. This may seem uncomfortable, but after starting doing it you’ll have a lot of fun.
Early this year, I wrote a post about computer users groups (which evolved into specific operating systems / programing languages / technologies groups) and how those groups kept alive the whole tech. community, the hacking spirit. Then, I asked myself if Web(maker) local groups/clubs could nurture a movement around the Open Web? And I think they could. There are a lot of good things to learn from Users Groups: their self-organizing / decentralized culture, their focus on sharing knowledge and help others to understand software.
The various user groups and communities of practice I belonged in the past years helped me not only to learn more about software and tech. platforms, but also nurtured my skills and, most importantly, made me adhere to a set of ethics of software/technology development. However, I believe we could innovate more in this space, from the community building perspective. We now have the tools and the platform to do this. The ethics stance has been one of the dominant values of groups around free software / GNU Linux.
Bellow, I’m highlighting some outputs and insights I got from some events I facilitated in the last six months. In concrete, I’ll take Hackasaurus program – because it demonstrates that can offer local groups and communities the building blocks needed to tinker, create and learn, and potentially helping build this kind of mixed, different local groups/communities.

Photo by Samuel Huron
Mozilla’s Hackasaurus is a great tool that helps simplifying web making and learning, so a broader audience could at least understand what the Web is and how it works. But, it also opens a way to a lot more and engages curious users into building the web and take a more active part into a community.
Here are three events where we brought Hackasaurus to different audiences:
June, HackJam Barcelona, Citilab
Output: In June we organized the first HackJam in Barcelona. We spent one hour with 16 kids (10 – 12 years old), introducing them to the first phase of web making (understanding the remixable/buildable nature of the web). We started with a small, simple example of a “remixed paper magazine” (collage), so participants could see how they can change a story, remix a content just by experimenting and playing around. Then, we dived into playing with X-Rays Googles and remixing some webpages.
In this session we didn’t have enough time to deep into HTML/CSS and , but still, I learned a lot from it. And it was a great achievement to help kids discover that the web is something you can play with it, remix, build it, use it to express your feelings, vision, etc.
Although by the end of the sessions I had the feeling of “we should have done more… (dive more into making and the understanding HTML)”, after seeing the enthusiasm of participants presenting their “hacks” I realized that we actually unlocked a critical part of the web building blocks, opening the way to more. And most importantly, part of the participants wanted to learn more and play more with the tool.
October, facilitators HackJam, Televall Telcentre Output: This was a second HackJam Enric and I facilitated, this time in a village by the Pyrenees range, at Televall – the first telecenter built in Catalonia. The audience was very different from the first one: four facilitators from the very Telecenter. We spent almost two hours demoing with Hackasaurus X-Googles Rays and remixing content on webpages. The aim was to understand the potential that today’s web has: you can build almost everything on it and there are also tools as Hackasaurus that simplify the understanding and learning process and engage in a creative way.
Before the session, I had a conversation with people there about the activities and life at the telecentre. “Now, teens and kids have their own computers and access to Internet. They go straight to home after school”. It was somehow sad to see how those spaces that years ago pioneered the access to Internet and technology are at now risk of losing their role and impact in the local digital society. But, at the same time, I was thinking about the opportunity we, local community of practice as Mozilla, could offer to those spaces, making them again be at the heart of digital transformations.
How using Mozilla’s tools and learning programs such as Hackasaurus, Popcornmaker or Hive (a learning network concept) could make Telecentres think and be more like the Web, transform them from the simple “access to computers / Internet points” to community learning centers – building local communities and help local youth become web literates.
November, demoing Hackasaurus and Popcornmaker, Digital Humanities event, CCCB Output: Last month we were invited to join the Center of Contemporany Culture of Barcelona and Institute of Innovation and Research Center at George Pompidou from Paris to participate at the annual Digital Humanities event. More than 30 mediators, facilitators, educators and representatives of public, cultural and research institutions participated. Enric, Toni and I helped with a one hour hands-on session demoing Popcornmaker, Hackasaurus and Universal Subtitles. Then we participated in a broader conversation – “Education and contributions in the future of Digital Humanities”, where we explored the impact that informal, community-learning education has in shaping the future of Digital Humanities. The debate around education and Digital Humanities was very insightful for me. One of the starting points of this debate was about the decrease of attention coming as a natural effect of new technologies (as Internet, Web, Social networks), especially among teens and kids. This raised a series of questions and answers around how we can use the same technology to transform those effects into something good to society (adapt to technological/connected life and not remain indifferent, make efforts to understand how technology works instead of taking it for granted, start using technology to create not just consume it). And in a way, Hackasaurus or Popcorn can transform those effects and focus the attention to creating/building/remixing/experimenting. Humanities, a critical part of our education system, need to adapt much more to new technologies. Around the topics brought into discussion were: thinking about the creation of a new school, how community based learning models and programs could reshape the education in a digital, connected age.
One of the most interesting parts was when discussing about the need of building new communities of practice (communities that could drive innovation, initiate new processes and, above all, be driven by a desire to create and make things) and build relationships between local communities of practice and cultural/research public institutions (museums, public libraries etc.).
There were more events this year that influenced part of my thinking about communities in general (and Mozilla Community in a first place) – the GlobalMelt workshop, Design Jam Barcelona, the small and informal Barcelona UX/WebDev community meet-ups, MoJo Hackfest. And this year I also focused more on working with local civic centers and public spaces – which I consider critical for building new healthy communities (more on this in the following blogposts). Mozilla started two years ago to explore new ways to advance in its mission, grow and rejuvenate the community, diversify our interest domains and expand focus (go beyond Firefox). Now, with programs and tools as Hackasaurus and Popcorn that are getting stronger, the work on Identity and Apps Ecosystem is a huge opportunity to put efforts on building a new kind of community (both local and global), inspire others and promote a new way of working and building relationships. Building a community of Webmakers with an ethics stance at its core (build web using native web technologies, work in open, share, respect the user) is one of the long-term goals Mozilla has. And there are lot of things to do to achieve this, a lot of things to change and some exciting upcoming years for designing this community. In the next blog posts I want to highlight some of my experiences and share some concrete steps on how we might do this, at least at the local level. This is the first post from a series through I’ll try to express my personal thinking and vision on Community Building and Development.
I have only a few days to accept the invitation I received for attending the Mozilla European Contributors meeting in Berlin, November 12 – 13. I’m still asking myself about what I can get from there or which is the value I can add to the event.
Given that the event is scheduled in a relatively busy week (right after the Mozilla Festival and another Digital Humanities event in Barcelona), I was thinking seriously – what would be worth my time to attend? .
I’ve been participating to a number of Mozilla Contributor events (from European, Balkans Mozcamps; to Summit and Fossdem(s)). It’s fantastic to (re)meet the other people in the project, talk and see what they do in their locale. But, at the same time, there is a high risk to transform all those contributor meet-ups in a pleasant routine, which is the opposite of the “extremely fast changing process” that the web, the organization and even the community is facing.
I remember that 2 years ago, in Prague, I started a discussion about “remixing the Mozilla Manifesto” and I attended some thoughtful sessions around open web and back then, the early idea of Drumbeat. It was an incredible experience to be in those groups, taking a lot with me after the event.
And since the last MozCamp, both my focus and vision on Mozilla as a project have changed a bit. In those 2 years I’ve seen a few new communities rising up, met dozens of new Mozillians and I’m continuously meeting new people that share the same values as us and need to find their place in the Mozilla community.
Mozilla Eu contributors (and the Project in general) have a tremendous opportunity to meet face to face, once a year (an opportunity that many open source / free culture projects do not always have). For this, I think that Mozillians should take seriously the emphasis on “generated value” (for both participants and organization as a whole) .
Following, I’ll try to summarize in 3 points my expectations from the next MozCamp event:
Collaboratively making of the agenda
And no, by collaboratively, I don’t mean that volunteers can apply to give presentations or organize a session.
Doing the event collaboratively means to be allowed to participate from the point 0 – from identifying the *problem*, why we get together there, what do people expect / want to add, which is the aim, giving the critical moment in the community.
Collaboratively also means that anyone can have his/her say, that the event can be hacked depends on how things evolves and/or use tools Etherpad/a special mailing lists to add feedback/suggestions during the preparation process.
More open spaces – and make sure that if a participant wants to host his own brainstorming/hacking/prototyping session he or she will have a space. It often happens to get ideas on site (the result of being in the same place with so many people).
Community-based
The last events tend to have the most of the presentations/sessions led by community members with an employee status (that could indirectly create a top-down/formal ambient that kills potential community innovation, great ideas or slow-down the community enthusiasm). Even though I’m in favor of not differentiating between volunteers/employees/collaborators (all are community peers) I think that a balance is necessary.
Listen and give mentorship when needed. Just that! It’s much more in the community spirit than trainings (although would be fantastic to have event facilitators trainings).
There are mostly European core contributors and maybe some new ones - Inspire trust and discuss in open.
Focus on the essential
I know that 2 years since the last MozCamp is much and exists the tendency to cover everything in Mozilla (Firefox) project but, at the same time, trying to do everything is not the most effective solution. We currently experience some deep problems in the community, such as:
*** centralized l10n model and leak of outside participation in the process;
*** people leaving the community (which is normal after a few years of contribution) and “the problem” of finding replacement or creating space for others to contribute/lead;
*** a still unclear image of Mozilla’s Culture / community member motivation.
Although I see the Community and Development track interesting, there are still things that don’t convince me (such as a more elaborated page w/ what peers from community would love to see in there).
As a one concrete thing, I would be mostly interested in MozSpaces, because I believe that this could be an important component in nurturing a community learning/development path. And not only the “official” MozSpaces, but open and coworking spaces in general – and how we could interact/engage w/ other communities in there and spread the Mozilla’s culture, how to design activities and events and build new spaces for other people (and new Mozillians) to participate.
The topic for this year is “Many voices, one Mozilla” – I really hope to see this a productive and solution design oriented meet-up. And as a fellow Mozillian says: “Stop Yammering and Start Hammering!”.